hngrok
Top Archive
Login
  1. GPT-5.2 from openai.com
    220 by atgctg 1h ago | |

    Discussion (197):

    Comment analysis in progress.

  2. Litestream VFS from fly.io
    89 by emschwartz 1h ago | |

    Discussion (28):

    Comment analysis in progress.

  3. Going Through Snowden Documents, Part 1 from libroot.org
    36 by libroot 47m ago | |

    Discussion (11):

    Comment analysis in progress.

  4. Show HN: SIM – Apache-2.0 n8n alternative from github.com/simstudioai
    35 by waleedlatif1 2h ago | |

    Discussion (4):

    More comments needed for analysis.

  5. Craft software that makes people feel something from rapha.land
    146 by lukeio 5h ago | |

    Discussion (62):

    Comment analysis in progress.

  6. An Orbital House of Cards: Frequent Megaconstellation Close Conjunctions from arxiv.org
    65 by rapnie 4h ago | |

    Discussion (34):

    Comment analysis in progress.

  7. Show HN: I've asked Claude to improve codebase quality 200 times from gricha.dev
    289 by Gricha 2d ago | | |

    Article: 22 min

    An article discussing an experiment where Claude, an AI agent, was asked to improve the quality of a codebase 200 times over a Thanksgiving weekend. The process led to significant changes in the codebase, including increased lines of code, tests, and utility functions, but also resulted in some unnecessary or unmaintainable additions.

    AI-generated code may lead to unexpected changes in software projects, potentially affecting maintainability and development efficiency.
    • Claude was asked to improve the codebase 200 times using a specific prompt.
    • The process led to substantial changes, including increased lines of code and tests.
    • Some of the changes were unnecessary or unmaintainable, such as reinventing utilities and implementing patterns from other programming languages.
    Quality:
    The article provides a detailed account of the experiment and its outcomes, without overly sensationalizing the results.

    Discussion (222):

    The comment thread discusses the utility of Rust's result-handling system in various contexts, comparing it to exception throwing conventions and other languages' error handling methods.

    • Rust's system can be useful in certain contexts
    Counterarguments:
    • Exception throwing conventions are preferred for quick projects
    • Clunkier implementation in TypeScript compared to Go style or Rust enum
    Artificial Intelligence AI Applications, Code Generation
  8. Pop!_OS 24.04 LTS with Cosmic Desktop Environment Released from blog.system76.com
    23 by onnnon 36m ago | |

    Discussion (2):

    More comments needed for analysis.

  9. Prove It All Night: With no fame or fortune, what keeps a band onstage? (1999) from chicagoreader.com
    17 by NaOH 8d ago | |

    Discussion (0):

    More comments needed for analysis.

  10. Rivian Unveils Custom Silicon, R2 Lidar Roadmap, and Universal Hands Free from riviantrackr.com
    74 by doctoboggan 1h ago | |

    Discussion (86):

    Comment analysis in progress.

More

In the past 13d 23h 15m, we processed 2437 new articles and 103165 comments with an estimated reading time savings of 48d 14h 27m

About | FAQ | Privacy Policy | Feature Requests | Contact